Supreme Court Won’t Hear Louisiana Spouse-Swapping Case
One of those cases that shows the “rational basis” test might be misnamed.
One of those cases that shows the “rational basis” test might be misnamed.
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.
Good news for those who couldn’t get all their frog-stabbing done during the summer and fall.
Not killing this guy is about the only thing the SFPD did right here.
In this edition: creative sentencing, meddling agents, the Code of Hammurabi, and a very, very bad idea.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
The evidence is pretty overwhelming, frankly.
Among other things.
In this edition (among other things): the law of unintended consequences again; Chuck Norris litigates, for once; and why some contracts may need a “no-sex clause.”
The judge smelled a different motive, though.